SWIFT begins preparing for centrally-controlled digital currencies

New Hampshire Republican governor vetoes mask mandate ban bill

CDC now recommends COVID-19 testing for all domestic air travel, including the vaccinated

Wuhan lab did monkeyvirus gain-of-function research on  last year

Top Putin adviser warns of ‘global famine’ by the end of this year

<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 60.403%;"><iframe style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;" src="https://streamable.com/e/h881fu" width="100%" height="100%" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></div>
<div></div>
<div>

World Health Organization European Advisory Group of Experts in Immunization former Vice President Professor <a href="https://www.emedevents.com/speaker-profile/christian-perronne">Christian Perronne</a> yesterday said that all vaccinated people must quarantine over the winter months or risk serious illness.

Perronne specializes in tropical pathologies and emerging infectious diseases. He was Chairman of the Specialized Committee on Communicable Diseases of the High Council of Public Health.

Confirming the rapidly deteriorating situation in Israel and the UK, the infectious disease expert stated: "Vaccinated people should be put in quarantine, and should be isolated from the society."

He went on to say: "Unvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous for others. It's proven in Israel now - I'm in contact with many physicians in Israel - they're having big problems, severe cases in the hospitals are among vaccinated people, and in UK also, you have the larger vaccination program and also there are problems."

The current working group on the COVID-19 pandemic in France was reported to be "utterly panicked" on receipt of the news, fearing pandemonium if it follows the guidance of the experts.

Israeli doctor Kobi Haviv told Channel 13 News: “95% of seriously ill patients are vaccinated. Fully vaccinated people account for 85-90% of hospitalizations. We are opening more and more COVID branches. The effectiveness of vaccines is declining or disappearing."

</div>
En español <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/espanol/experto-en-inmunizacion-las-personas-no-vacunadas-no-son-peligrosas-las-personas-vacunadas-son-peligrosas-para-los-demas/">aquí</a>

immunization-expert-unvaccinated-people-are-not-dangerous-vaccinated-people-are-dangerous-for-others.png

Immunization expert: 'Unvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous for others'

A Lancet <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3949410" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated</a> people in Sweden was conducted among 1.6 million individuals over nine months. It <a href="https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/swedish-study-shows-covid-vaccines" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">showed</a> that protection against symptomatic COVID-19 declined with time, such that by six months, some of the more vulnerable vaccinated groups were at greater risk than their unvaccinated peers.Doctors are calling this phenomena in the repeatedly vaccinated “immune erosion” or “acquired immune deficiency”, accounting for elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that either affect them more rapidly, resulting in death, or more slowly, resulting in chronic illness.COVID vaccines are not traditional vaccines. Rather, they cause cells to reproduce one portion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the spike protein. The vaccines thus induce the body to create spike proteins. A person only creates antibodies against this one limited portion (the spike protein) of the virus. This has several downstream deleterious effects.First, these vaccines “mis-train” the immune system to recognize only a small part of the virus (the spike protein). Variants that differ, even slightly, in this protein are able to escape the narrow spectrum of antibodies created by the vaccines.Second, the vaccines create “vaccine addicts,” meaning persons become dependent upon regular booster shots, because they have been “vaccinated” only against a tiny portion of a mutating virus. Australian Health Minister Dr. Kerry Chant has stated that <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter-Duesberg/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus/links/5724a6bd08aef9c00b846323/Inventing-the-AIDS-Virus.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">COVID will be with us forever</a> and people will “have to get used to” taking endless vaccines. “This will be a regular cycle of vaccination and revaccination.”Third, the vaccines do not prevent infection in the nose and upper airways, and vaccinated individuals have been shown to have much higher viral loads in these regions. This leads to the vaccinated becoming “super-spreaders” as they carry extremely high viral loads.In addition, the vaccinated become more clinically ill than the unvaccinated. Scotland <a href="https://jeffreydachmd.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Public-Health-Scotland-21-08-04-covid19-publication_report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">reported</a> that the infection fatality rate in the vaccinated is 3.3 times the unvaccinated, and the risk of death if hospitalized is 2.15 times the unvaccinated.A June <a href="https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/308653" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">report</a> on Israel's Channel 12 News revealed that in the months since the vaccines were rolled out, 6,765 people who received both shots had contracted coronavirus, while epidemiological tracing revealed an additional 3,133 people <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/news/post/immunization-expert-unvaccinated-people-are-not-dangerous-vaccinated-people-are-dangerous-for-others/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">contracted COVID-19 from those vaccinated</a> individuals.Meanwhile, <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMcibr2113694" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">New England Journal of Medicine</a> researchers have found that autoimmune response to the coronavirus spike protein may last indefinitely: “Ab2 antibodies binding to the original receptor on normal cells therefore have the potential to mediate profound effects on the cell that could result in pathologic changes, particularly in the long term — long after the original antigen itself has disappeared.” These antibodies produced against the coronavirus spike protein could be responsible for the current unprecedented wave of myocarditis and neurological illnesses, and even more problems in the future.<div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe class="rumble" width="100%" height="500" src="https://rumble.com/embed/vmuf0u/?pub=4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>Indefinite uncontrolled autoimmune response to the coronavirus spike protein may produce a wave of antibodies called anti-idiotype antibodies or Ab2s that continue to damage human bodies long after clearing either Sars-Cov-2 itself or those spike proteins that the shots cause the body's cells to produce, explained former New York Times reporter <a href="https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/a-frightening-new-potential-explanation" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex Berenson</a>.Spike protein antibodies may themselves produce a second wave of antibodies, called anti-idiotype antibodies or Ab2s. Those Ab2s may modulate the immune system’s initial response by binding with and destroying the first wave of antibodies.“Our immune systems produce these antibodies in response to both vaccination and natural infection with COVID,” wrote Berenson. “However - though the researchers do not say so explicitly, possibly because doing so would be politically untenable - spike protein antibody levels are MUCH higher following vaccination than infection. Thus the downstream response to vaccination may be more severe.”America's Frontline Doctors (<a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">AFLDS</a>) Chief Science Officer former Pfizer Vice President Michael Yeadon responded to the research: "This is unprecedented. What is happening is not understood."Commentators on Israeli TV have reported that contacts in the Health Ministry have termed this ‘immune erosion’:<div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe width="100%" height="500px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bKFT4Rve9Zg" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>“While some are concerned that blood IgG antibodies fall with time, I am not convinced that this is a relevant measure,” Yeadon continued. "Respiratory virus infection begins in the lungs and nasopharynx. Neither are protected by blood antibodies, which are molecules too large to diffuse into airways tissue. What protects against infection and initial viral replication is secretory IgA antibodies and T-cells in airways, neither of which have been studied in any efficacy trial."The empirical data are very worrying. In most countries now, high fractions of the population have been vaccinated. If the Swedish study is a guide, we should anticipate seeing this immune erosion more widely. The most concerning aspect of that study is that those most in need of protection are those in whom immune erosion is most marked: the elderly, males, and those with comorbidities."Some have used the results of this study to support the widespread use of so-called ‘booster’ shots. It has to be said: No one has any safety data about such a plan. If immune erosion occurs after two doses and just a few months, how can we exclude the possibility that effects of an untested ‘booster’ will not erode more rapidly and to a greater extent? And what then would be the response? A fourth injection. Madness."It’s long past time when known safe and effective drug treatments be used as the leading response to symptomatic infection (antivirals, corticosteroids, anti-inflammatories).“In this way, we don’t expose entire populations to experimental medical interventions when only a very small fraction of the population are at notable risk from this virus, which, all hype aside, is by no means exceptional in its lethality compared with numerous others such as seasonal influenza.”Yeadon concluded: "Europe is all but gone. The lights are going out. Austria and Germany now subject their unvaccinated to house arrest. In Greece, the unvaccinated are subject to escalating fines, non-payment of which is converted into prison time. In Lithuania, the unvaccinated are excluded from society. The booster campaigns are running full-pelt everywhere.“Someone, somewhere knows what’s going to happen. Will immunity-erosion worsen more speedily and to a greater extent after this untested ‘booster’? The U.K. government has already said that the fourth injection is to take place a mere three months after the third. It’s utter madness. Yet such is the hermetic control of media that nothing much emerges into the public consciousness.”<div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe class="rumble" width="100%" height="500" src="https://rumble.com/embed/vip78g/?pub=4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>En español <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/espanol/post/sindrome-de-inmunodeficiencia-adquirida-por-la-vacuna-vaids-deberiamos-anticiparnos-a-ver-este-desgaste-inmunologico-mas-ampliamente/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">aquí</a>

iStock-1321548325.jpg

'If immune erosion occurs after two doses and just a few months, how can we exclude the possibility that effects of an untested "booster" will not erode more rapidly and to a greater extent?'

Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS): 'We should anticipate seeing this immune erosion more widely'

by Mary Kate Moran, AFLDS Paralegal and David Dalia, AFLDS AttorneyOn March 18, 2022, Federal Judge Trevor McFadden blocked a D.C. law permitting kids as young as 11 to receive experimental COVID-19 injections - or any other vaccines - without parental consent.&nbsp; Judge McFadden temporarily halted the law on the grounds it is unconstitutional.&nbsp;D.C. quietly passed the “Minor Consent for Vaccinations Act Amendment of 2020” (MCA Law) on December 23, 2020, and it became effective in March 2021. A group of D.C. area plaintiff parents responded by filing two separate lawsuits against the MCA Law in the summer of 2021.&nbsp;The parents’ lawsuits allege violations of religious freedom and parental rights.&nbsp;They also argue the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA), which is a federal law, supersedes the D.C. law.&nbsp; The NCVIA requires that any healthcare worker who administers shots to children must notify the parents or legal guardians.&nbsp; In sharp contrast, the MCA Law requires doctors and schools to actively lie to parents&nbsp;who claimed religious exemptions and to create unlawful and fraudulent medical records. This sounds more like a criminal activity than a public health activity.&nbsp;As Del Bigtree explained on his March 18, 2022 episode of “The Highwire”:&nbsp;“What this law did was basically force the doctor to lie to the parents and create a fake vaccination record.&nbsp; It also forced the school to lie to the parents about the actual vaccination record of the child.&nbsp; It forced the insurance company to create fake billing so the parents couldn’t see that they’ve been billed for this vaccination.”&nbsp; See the video <a href="https://thehighwire.com/news/lawsuit-halts-law-allowing-doctors-to-vaccinate-11-yr-olds-without-parental-consent/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.When has anyone ever heard of a “law” that “requires” doctors and teachers to create misleading, fraudulent, and false medical records?The defendants were backed by the D.C. Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (DCAAP), the American Medical Association (AMA), and other premier medical groups.&nbsp;&nbsp;DCAAP AND AMA filed an amicus brief on August 6, 2021, stating, “Vaccination is a critically important area of medical care in which minors who are capable of giving informed consent should be permitted to obtain treatment&nbsp;without parent approval&nbsp;[emphasis added].”&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;At the other end of the spectrum, highly credentialed America’s Frontline Doctor and Florida Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo, asserts that healthy children from ages 5 to 17 may not benefit from receiving the injections.&nbsp;&nbsp;He states, “Based on currently available data, the risks of administering COVID-19 vaccination among healthy children may outweigh the benefits. That is why these decisions should be made on an individual basis, and never mandated.”&nbsp; To that end, on March 8, 2022, Florida became the first state in the U.S. to issue pediatric guidance recommending children from ages 5 to 17 may not benefit from injections.&nbsp; See&nbsp;<a href="https://www.floridahealth.gov/newsroom/2022/03/20220308-FDOH-covid19-vaccination-recommendations-children.pr.html#:~:text=%E2%80%94%20The%20Florida%20Department%20of%20Health,currently%20available%20COVID%2D19%20vaccine" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a> or <a href="https://dashboard.aflds.dev/uploads/PDF_1_FL_Guidance_for_Pediatric_COVID_19_Vaccines_March_8_2022_1ce9b9ded6.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.Although the AAP (DC Chapter) and the AMA amici state that they are dedicated to “child and adolescent health”, and denounce vaccine “conspiracy&nbsp;theories”, there is no mention of the very real dangers to children (as evidenced by the over one million recorded reports of mRNA injection adverse reactions) made in their amicus brief.&nbsp; These adverse reactions include reports of 26,058 deaths, 143,554 hospitalizations, 37,133 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis, and 48,342 permanently disabled individuals among all age groups, as recorded by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as of the date of this writing. See&nbsp;<a href="https://openvaers.com/covid-data" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.&nbsp;Additionally, the CDC makes claims the injections are safe for children.&nbsp;However, as of this writing, VAERS reports 91 deaths, 1,238 cases of myocarditis, and 386 cases of children ages 5 to 17 who have been permanently disabled from the injections.&nbsp; See&nbsp;<a href="https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-summaries" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>. &nbsp;What’s more alarming is the current deaths and injuries among all age groups is likely much higher.&nbsp; While the exact numbers in all categories is unknown, it’s estimated that fewer than 1% of adverse reactions to the injections&nbsp;are reported to the FDA. See&nbsp;<a href="https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a> and <a href="https://dashboard.aflds.dev/uploads/PDF_2_Electronic_Support_for_Public_Health_Vaccine_Adverse_Event_Reporting_System_fc89cd12c2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.Also completely missing from the amici's&nbsp;defense of surreptitious mRNA injections&nbsp;of children without parental consent or knowledge, is the now known fact that these experimental mRNA injections fail the FDA 50% efficacy test, according to a March 22, 2022 article by Meryl Nass, M.D. of the Children’s Health Defense.&nbsp; See “<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-kids-fails-fda-standard-efficacy-2/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pfizer COVID Vaccine for Kids 5 - 11 Fails FDA Standard for 50% Efficacy</a>”&nbsp;or see <a href="https://dashboard.aflds.dev/uploads/PDF_3_Pfizer_Covid_Vaccine_for_Kids_5_11_Fails_FDA_Standard_for_50_Efficacy_84cec675f9.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.It’s challenging for many adults to deal with the current onslaught of unprecedented injection mandates.&nbsp;&nbsp;Imagine what it is like for children and teens who have been inundated by an intense, relentless, (and likely illegal) mass-media propaganda campaign to be injected.&nbsp;Teenagers have always been more susceptible and vulnerable to peer and societal pressures.&nbsp; The MCA Law is aimed at persuading this very population to be injected and making the decision much easier and more convenient.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The MCA Law is comprised of several devious and underhanded tactics which seemingly encourage a susceptible young child to pursue the injections.&nbsp;&nbsp;For example, injection clinics are placed in and around the school areas and rewards are given to participants.&nbsp;&nbsp;Under the MCA Law, the healthcare person administering the injections can receive financial compensation via the parents’ health insurer.&nbsp;&nbsp;Yet the insurer is not required to notify the parents of the injections or the reimbursement.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Under the MCA Law, a child may collaborate with the school and other health agencies to surreptitiously obtain his immunization record and override any parental religious exemption to injections or vaccines.&nbsp; This makes it easy for a child to receive an injection without parental knowledge.&nbsp; Interestingly, the MCA Law does not attempt to reach into the sanctity of medical exemptions filed by parents.&nbsp; The MCA Law is a rather brazen attempt to overrule religious (versus secular) parents’ rights over their child’s body and health.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Thankfully, Judge McFadden agreed with the&nbsp;plaintiffs and ruled in the parents’ favor in both lawsuits. Judge McFadden found the following:&nbsp;“The District’s law requires providers to hide children’s vaccination status from parents who invoke their religious exemption rights but not from other parents…[emphasis added].”&nbsp;“...If a minor’s parent has filed a religious exemption for the child and the child elects to get a vaccine anyway, a healthcare provider must leave blank part 3 of the Certificate…(Part 3 is the child’s immunization record). This serves to obfuscate the child’s vaccination from his parents&nbsp;[emphasis added].”“...The Court finds that the MCA causes Booth’s injury because without it there is no avenue for minors to receive vaccines absent parental consent.&nbsp;Removing the law would revert the District to the standard age of consent of 18. See 22-B D.C.M.R. § 600.1.” &nbsp;See “Memorandum Opinion, Mazer v. Bowser, et al., 21-cv-01782, March 18, 2022, US Dist. Court, DC” or see <a href="https://dashboard.aflds.dev/uploads/PDF_4_Mazer_v_Bowser_Memo_Opinion_03_18_2022_75e6057103.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.As Judge McFadden pointed out, the legal age of consent in D.C. is 18 years of age under&nbsp;22-B D.C.M.R. § 600.1. There are only narrow exceptions&nbsp;to the legal age of consent for minors in that statute,&nbsp;due to their youth,&nbsp;inexperience, and lack of mature&nbsp;judgment and sound decision-making. The MCA Law purported to apply to “minors&nbsp;who are capable of giving informed consent.”&nbsp;One must wonder how “informed consent” -- as opposed to coercion and peer pressure -- could possibly be given by a minor absent parental consent.&nbsp;There is intense, pro-Covid injection propaganda present in the D.C. school system.&nbsp; Are the VAERS adverse reaction statistics, statistical risks, and the failure of the FDA’s 50% Efficacy Test discussed with the 5- to 11-year-old children during the teacher's “informed consent” conversations with them?Judge McFadden’s ruling is indeed pivotal.&nbsp; It not only sets a legal precedent for religious freedom against injection tyranny for individuals of all ages but especially children.&nbsp;&nbsp;There is a similar bill in California (Senate Bill 866) which, if passed, would allow kids as young as 12 to be injected with the injections without their parents’ consent.&nbsp;&nbsp;Hopefully, Judge McFadden’s ruling will effectively halt the rollout of Senate Bill 866 and any future or similarly concocted bills.&nbsp;&nbsp;Related News Links:&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchildrenshealthdefense.salsalabs.org%2Fchd-wins-federal-district-court-injunction%3FwvpId%3Da0b0563f-9682-4fb3-a0f3-84f9161d97e9&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cmarykate%40aflds.org%7C4d769fe29aed40ce42ef08da0ea2a3b0%7Cb86874a894e144f8891fcd4fa7ac80e6%7C1%7C0%7C637838388989299252%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=gdjjlH6YU05Uoc1R8txql2yXc0wlvAOxrAiimmFe1ac%3D&amp;reserved=0">CHD Wins Federal District Court Injunction On DC’s Minor Consent for Vaccinations Act (salsalabs.org)</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theepochtimes.com%2Fjudge-blocks-washington-law-that-let-children-get-vaccines-without-parental-consent_4348649.html&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cmarykate%40aflds.org%7C4d769fe29aed40ce42ef08da0ea2a3b0%7Cb86874a894e144f8891fcd4fa7ac80e6%7C1%7C0%7C637838388989299252%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=PDEMbSWmFDlpBe1MPfYKp2c8FrKd6rf9VrKcorvrL24%3D&amp;reserved=0">Judge Blocks Washington Law That Let Children Get Vaccines Without Parental Consent (theepochtimes.com)</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifesitenews.com%2Fnews%2Fvictory-dc-court-grants-injunction-against-law-allowing-minors-to-consent-to-vaccination%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cmarykate%40aflds.org%7C4d769fe29aed40ce42ef08da0ea2a3b0%7Cb86874a894e144f8891fcd4fa7ac80e6%7C1%7C0%7C637838388989299252%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=lrklQogIkhhaDSsuijzPwStAoW1BbQoY4P1e1Chn2EY%3D&amp;reserved=0">Federal court blocks DC law allowing minors to consent to vaccination - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsmax.com%2Fus%2Fchildren-covid19-vaccine-washington-dc%2F2022%2F03%2F21%2Fid%2F1062271%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cmarykate%40aflds.org%7C4d769fe29aed40ce42ef08da0ea2a3b0%7Cb86874a894e144f8891fcd4fa7ac80e6%7C1%7C0%7C637838388989299252%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=A18o3nrTFI4eihHcEIQE0SLnOOslVzKKgDhl2TVeaV4%3D&amp;reserved=0">https://www.newsmax.com/us/children-covid19-vaccine-washington-dc/2022/03/21/id/1062271/</a>

large_iStock-909818266.jpg

medium_iStock-909818266.jpg

small_iStock-909818266.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-909818266.jpg

iStock-909818266.jpg

Legal News

When has anyone ever heard of a 'law' that 'requires' doctors and teachers to create misleading, fraudulent, false medical records?

Judge quashes DC law allowing children as young as 11 to receive experimental injections without parents’ consent

A <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10928-z">study</a> published last week in the journal Nature looking at heart-related emergency calls for ambulances in Israel before, during, and after Israel’s vaccination campaign found a 25% increase in ambulance calls involving cardiovascular events for ages 16-39 compared to the same period in the two previous years.The authors of the study were MIT professor <a href="https://mitsloan.mit.edu/faculty/directory/retsef-levi">Retsef Levi</a>, <a href="https://il.linkedin.com/in/eli-jaffe-586412112">Eli Jaffe</a>, a Director at Magen David Adom (MADA) Israel’s national ambulance service, and MIT postdoctoral fellow <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/christopherfsun">Christopher Sun</a>.The authors reached out to Israel's Health Ministry early on in their research to get more data that could help explain the correlation between the vaccination campaign and heart-related ambulance calls for young people. The Ministry refused to cooperate with the requests.Before the study’s data and conclusions were formally published, the Ministry dismissed its findings by saying the study was not published nor peer-reviewed.Now, after the study has passed peer review and has been published in Nature, a highly reputed science journal, the Health Ministry chose to attack the study on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/Health.gov.il/posts/362449312583541">social media</a> and released a <a href="https://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/reports/vaccine-efficacy-safety-follow-up-committee/he/files_publications_corona_cardiac-arrest-acute-coronary-syndrome-mda.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0XHwfIck1WIUTAdlFYONIyIzyUkoGmkFE4AcsiYh4yQdrnm2-zwhL1QH0">presentation</a> of its critiques.&nbsp;MOH’s critiques in contextFirst, the Ministry reassures the public by saying they looked into the ambulance calls mentioned in the study and determined that there was no connection to the vaccination. The Ministry has not released the complete data on the 981 ambulance calls in question so we'll have to take their word on this.The Ministry provides overall percentages indicating what happened to the patients after the ambulance calls to show that most were not that serious. This is irrelevant to the conclusion of the study, though, since the study's endpoint was a comparison between the number of cases this year and in previous years. &nbsp;The study did not address the severity of the cases in any year.The same goes for the Ministry’s point that just because the paramedic catalogues the call as an “acute coronary syndrome” (ACS) or “cardiac arrest” (CA) doesn’t mean that’s what the patient was suffering from – as later determined in hospital. This “error” in determination would also have occurred in previous years.The Ministry points out that 2019 saw an even larger increase in calls compared to 2018, however, if 2021 is compared to the prior five-year average (as opposed to just 2019 as in the study) the increase is even greater. &nbsp;&nbsp;MOH’s troubling past with transparency&nbsp;In an interview after the Health Ministry’s response, Professor Levi expressed disappointment with the Ministry’s continued lack of transparency and cooperation, saying that if they want to show no connection between vaccination and these ambulance calls, they could just release the data (without identifiers to protect patient privacy) he said so that he and his colleagues could analyze them.The MOH was <a href="https://www.facebook.com/machatzlakorona/posts/388011436559330">invited</a> to join Levi for an online discussion about the study and to defend its position, but the MOH ignored the invitation.&nbsp;Openly sharing data on the vaccination campaign and its effects on the population was <a href="https://youtu.be/Dk0B3Z8bW5k?t=450">touted as an advantage</a> when Israel signed up to be the world’s laboratory for the Pfizer vaccine.Instead, the Ministry of Health has refused numerous requests for information including <a href="https://www.facebook.com/machatzlakorona/photos/p.385354056825068/385354056825068/?type=3">the vaccination status of pregnant</a> women who suffered miscarriages, and other pregnancy complications.The Ministry <a href="https://aflds.org/news/post/israel-health-ministry-deletes-comments-on-covid-vaccine-adverse-events/">deleted hundreds</a> of replies to their Facebook post touting the safety of the booster shot, after thousands of people complained about the adverse reactions they had.The objectivity of Israel’s Health Ministry regarding Pfizer has been called into question since Pfizer became the healthcare system's <a href="https://www.health.gov.il/Subjects/Finance/Documents/D2_2017.pdf">largest donor</a> in 2017, donating over US $110 million in contributions during the <a href="https://www.health.gov.il/Subjects/Finance/Pages/donation_reports.aspx">last four years</a> 2017-2021. &nbsp;&nbsp;Cardiac calls increase around the worldAn increase in ambulance calls and cardiovascular cases among the young is not unique to Israel. &nbsp;<a href="https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/26/heart-disorders-and-excess-deaths-among-young-adults-rising/">Scotland</a> saw a 118% increase in the number of cardiovascular cases among 15-44-year-olds. In <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/frontlinenews/troubling-increase-in-cardiac-emergencies-whats-going-on/">Germany</a> during the vaccine rollout, there was a significant increase in admissions due to cardiovascular events. &nbsp;Many weeks saw 50% more admissions compared to recent years. <a href="https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/07/31/calls-ambulance-cardiac-arrest-unconsciousness-skyrocket/">England’s</a> ambulance service saw a 30% rise in cardiac calls, and <a href="https://aflds.org/news/post/queensland-health-minister-unable-to-explain-high-increase-in-heart-attacks-chest-pains/">Queensland</a>, Australia saw a 40% increase.

small_FRz3UpGXMAE0Yyo.jpg

thumbnail_FRz3UpGXMAE0Yyo.jpg

FRz3UpGXMAE0Yyo.jpg

World News

Israel answers study showing correlation between vaccine campaign and ambulance calls with flimsy refutation and brush-off

Israel Health Ministry attacks study, avoiding public debate

Who are COVID shots designed for?That’s just one of many intriguing questions prompted by a perusal of the Pfizer documents currently being published in batches after a&nbsp;federal&nbsp;judge&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;state of Texas ruled that the pharmaceutical company is obligated to release the data in a timely manner.The simple answer to our opening question is: everyone. That’s why we have been pressured and often mandated to take the shots – the powers-that-be want us all to take them. But with COVID, nothing is simple.By now, everyone must know that COVID is only dangerous for a very small tranche of the population. On average, people who die from COVID are in their late 70s to early 80s and have several serious comorbidities. Children are at virtually zero risk of dying of COVID; anyone under the age of 50 faces only a very tiny risk.Therefore, it would be reasonable to assume that vaccines against COVID were designed first and foremost for that small minority which genuinely has something to worry about – which would mean that the trial studies testing the shots before they were marketed should have focused on this small minority.That is not what happened.In the latest batch of documents released, Pfizer’s “exclusion criteria” for participation in its trials are listed.&nbsp;<a href="https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162-01-interim3-report-body.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Here</a> they are. &nbsp;I'd like to focus on #29.&nbsp;<figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_1_8b8c274015.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_2_fa8d03be62.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_3_7051e52524.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_4_2812f75e55.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_5_bfe90778a9.png"></figure>29. For older adults only: Have a condition known to put them at high risk for severe COVID-19, including those with any of the following risk factors:-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Hypertension-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Diabetes mellitus-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Asthma-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Chronic liver disease-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; … chronic kidney disease…-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Serious heart conditions…-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Cancer-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Are immune compromised…-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Resident in a long-term facility…&nbsp;That’s quite a comprehensive list even aside from the other 28 categories excluded. It also includes virtually everyone at high risk of dying of COVID, as we know now, and as Pfizer and others “in the know” had good reason to suspect then, with plenty of evidence to rely on. (Incidentally, asthma is no longer considered a risk factor, but Pfizer was playing it safe.)Playing it safe?Safe for whom?Didn’t they want to know if their shots were a) effective and b) safe for those who were theoretically most in need of them?Didn’t the FDA want to know?

large_iStock-458618835.jpg

medium_iStock-458618835.jpg

small_iStock-458618835.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-458618835.jpg

iStock-458618835.jpg

Medical

Pfizer

All high risk groups were excluded from the trial studies. Why?

The Pfizer Files: This month's revelations

Our self-anointed health experts have this irritating way of ignoring inconvenient facts

Death-by-expert: A cross-country study - Opinion

JP Sears reviews history of deliberately orchestrated famines

They’re causing food shortages?

People should not argue that restrictions, lockdowns, people avoidance, masks, testing, are unnecessary or wrong because COVID-19 only has a small chance of harming people

Don’t flinch at threats of 50% fatality pandemic - Opinion

We are in the midst of a deviously orchestrated lockstep move using massive global hypnosis, in which people are fearful of living and afraid of dying

Mass Formation Nation - Opinion

Regardless of measures to 'flatten the curve,' 'defeat COVID,' or 'curb the spread of coronavirus,' the waves go up and down more-or-less uniformly, lockdown or no, vaccine or no

A war that can't be won: What can we learn from Sweden's example?

The yellow elephant in the room

We can't talk about it, but we have to talk about it - Opinion

Let’s face it, the State of Israel is not what we thought it was.

The 'Jewish' State is no longer Jewish - Opinion

Anecdotal evidence: A closer look - Commentary

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with host John Strand presents On Location @ ReAwaken America Tour &nbsp;'Who Will Stand Up For Freedom?' featuring Roger Stone (Ep. 2085 - 5.23.22). The Real Story of Right Here ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlash

large_MicrosoftTeams-image.png

medium_MicrosoftTeams-image.png

small_MicrosoftTeams-image.png

thumbnail_MicrosoftTeams-image.png

MicrosoftTeams-image.png

Frontline Flash™ On Location: 'Who Will Stand Up For Freedom?' featuring Roger Stone @ ReAwaken America Tour

Frontline Flash.svg

Frontline Flash Full Logo-01.webp

Frontline Flash

Watch flash news presented in 120 seconds or less by Frontline Flash.

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘‘Parents: It's YOUR Job’ (Ep. 2084 - 5.2022).&nbsp; The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlash

large_Parents.jpg

medium_Parents.jpg

small_Parents.jpg

thumbnail_Parents.jpg

Parents.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘Parents: It's YOUR Job’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with host John Strand presents On Location @ ReAwaken America Tour 'Vote the Bums Out!'” featuring General Michael Flynn (Ep. 2083 - 5.18.22). The Real Story of Right Here ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlash

Frontline Flash™ On Location: “Vote the Bums Out!” feat. Gen. Michael Flynn @ ReAwaken America Tour

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘‘Fatalities End Mandates In Italian Court’ (Ep. 2082 - 5.12.22). &nbsp;The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlashSource: https://rairfoundation.com/italian-court-rules-mandatory-vaccination-unconstitutional-fatal-side-effects-to-risky-video/

large_Italian Court.jpg

medium_Italian Court.jpg

small_Italian Court.jpg

thumbnail_Italian Court.jpg

Italian Court.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘Fatalities End Mandates In Italian Court’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘Transgenderism: Emotion vs. Biology’ (Ep. 2081 - 5.11.22). &nbsp;The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlashSource: https://www.theepochtimes.com/kansas-state-senate-overrides-governors-veto-on-transgender-sports-ban-bill_4430446.html?

large_Transgenderism.jpg

medium_Transgenderism.jpg

small_Transgenderism.jpg

thumbnail_Transgenderism.jpg

Transgenderism.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘Transgenderism: Emotion vs. Biology’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘The Jab: A Real Risk to Pregnancy’ (Ep. 2080 - 5.9.22). &nbsp;The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlashSource: https://www.theepochtimes.com/what-ive-seen-in-the-last-two-years-is-unprecedented-physician-on-covid-vaccine-side-effects-on-pregnant-women_4428291.html?

large_Pregnancy Risk.jpg

medium_Pregnancy Risk.jpg

small_Pregnancy Risk.jpg

thumbnail_Pregnancy Risk.jpg

Pregnancy Risk.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘The Jab: A Real Risk to Pregnancy’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘Churches Paid To Push The Shots’ (Ep. 2079 - 5.6.22). &nbsp;The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlashSource: https://www.technocracy.news/churches-are-receiving-federal-grant-funds-to-promote-covid-injections/

large_Churches Paid.jpg

medium_Churches Paid.jpg

small_Churches Paid.jpg

thumbnail_Churches Paid.jpg

Churches Paid.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘Churches Paid To Push The Shots’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘769 Athletes Collapse...In 1 Yea’ (Ep. 2078 - 5.5.22). The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlashSource: <a href="https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/update-jaw-dropping-769-athletes-collapsed-competing-past-year-avg-age-players-suffering-cardiac-arrest-just-23-video/">https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/update-jaw-dropping-769-athletes-collapsed-competing-past-year-avg-age-players-suffering-cardiac-arrest-just-23-video/</a>

large_769 Athletes.jpg

medium_769 Athletes.jpg

small_769 Athletes.jpg

thumbnail_769 Athletes.jpg

769 Athletes.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘769 Athletes Collapse...In 1 Year’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Opinion

Most Popular

Frontline Flash

Support the cause