Biden regime hires Michael Chertoff to lead Ministry of Truth  – previously targeted Gateway Pundit and Breitbart – another Hunter Biden laptop truther

Biden administration buys millions of doses of monkeypox vaccine after case is confirmed in Massachusetts – health officials currently investigating second potential case in NYC

What’s behind outbreak of sudden, severe hepatitis in kids?

Louisiana governor reverses ‘insane mandate’ requiring COVID vaccines for students

Great Reset: EU ‘needs’ lockdown-like restrictions to curb Russian oil use

large_iStock-1337031195.jpg

medium_iStock-1337031195.jpg

small_iStock-1337031195.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1337031195.jpg

iStock-1337031195.jpg

Medical

Blogs

Do the beliefs we grew up with rest on a faulty foundation?

COVID-19 and our culture of vaccines

large_iStock-500320827.jpg

medium_iStock-500320827.jpg

small_iStock-500320827.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-500320827.jpg

iStock-500320827.jpg

US News

Falsely accused virus not even found in AIDS patients; test checks for HIV antibodies

Flashback: When doctor injected self with HIV to end 'greatest murderous fraud in medical history'

Yair Netanyahu, son of former Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has always been a staunch COVID-19 vaccine supporter, introduced during his father’s tenure.&nbsp;When Benjamin Netanyahu in March 2021 suggested that Israelis may need to get the shot every half year, political commentator Michelle Malkin tweeted, “NO. NO. HELL NO.”&nbsp;Responding to her tweet, Yair Netanyahu praised the vaccine in a tweet that has not aged well.&nbsp;“Michelle why no? I got the vaccine , and im all good! It’ll probably be once a year, like the flu vaccines are for decades now. What’s the big deal? Now in Israel we went back to normal like before 2019! everything is open! including clubs, sport events , concerts etc.”&nbsp;But less than a year later, Israelis were already subjected to two more doses of the vaccine, and the government refused to “go back to normal”. Instead, current Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and his cabinet increased mandates, being the first country in the world to introduce a “vaccine passport” and segregate society.&nbsp;But now, the former prime minister’s son does not sound as enthusiastic about the vaccine, reporting an odd adverse side effect on social media. Still, Netanyahu began his post defending the vaccine, though it is unclear if that was for fear of backlash.&nbsp;“I am in favor of corona vaccines and think they are life savers and call on anyone who has not had enough, to go get vaccinated,” he began his post on Telegram. “I myself have been vaccinated 3 times.” &nbsp;“There is but a strange phenomenon since I did the first vaccine that I can not decipher and I wanted to know if anyone else is experiencing it,” he continued. “Since the vaccine my skin has really changed and aged. Before the vaccine I could be in the sun for hours without sunscreen, and since the vaccine I have gotten burned and turned red after 5 minutes in the sun. Also my facial skin gets oily all the time. Has anyone else experienced strange side effects to their skin following the vaccine?"&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><script async="" src="https://telegram.org/js/telegram-widget.js?19" data-telegram-post="yairnetan/5938" data-width="100%"></script></div>According to <a href="https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf">documents</a> recently released by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under court order, Pfizer was forced to hire 600 new employees just to handle the reports of adverse vaccine side effects following the FDA’s emergency use authorization.“More are joining each month with an expected total of more than 1,800 additional resources by the end of June 2021,” Pfizer wrote.&nbsp;

small_photo_2022-04-03_18-48-43.jpg

thumbnail_photo_2022-04-03_18-48-43.jpg

photo_2022-04-03_18-48-43.jpg

World News

Yair Netanyahu previously praised vaccine

Former Israel PM's son admits possible permanent vaccine side effect

When the new vaccines against COVID hit the market, one thing was made clear; the vaccines protect against serious cases of COVID including hospitalizations and deaths.&nbsp;The clinical trials did not claim the vaccines reduced infections or transmission of the virus. Some may be still surprised about this, but with over a year of data, <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/library/pedia/vaccine-effectiveness/">this point</a> has become clear.&nbsp;But advocates were quick to point out the vaccines provide good protection against hospitalizations and death. So, while one need not take the vaccine to protect others, it is still recommended to protect oneself.&nbsp;Incredibly, the original studies that were conducted to get regulatory approval did not examine all-cause mortality. Rather, they looked only at mortality from COVID, since that was what they were designed to reduce. In fact, the vaccines showed a reduction in COVID deaths.&nbsp;But what about all-cause mortality? Could it be that the vaccines reduced deaths from COVID but increase deaths from other causes? This question led to much speculation and was reinforced by careful examination of the Pfizer <a href="https://www.fda.gov/media/151733/download">trial report</a> (page 23).The report showed that after 8 months of study, there were 21 deaths in the vaccinated group and 17 in the unvaccinated group. Indeed, there were more deaths from the vaccine group than there were in the placebo group. Not by much, just about a 22% relative increase, but since this was just below being statistically significant, and the report did not consider the deaths to be caused by the vaccine, the case was closed.Earlier this month, <a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=4072489">a study</a> made available as a preprint in The Lancet compared the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) to the&nbsp;adenovirus-vector (AstraZeneca and Johnson &amp; Johnson) vaccines to examine how they differ regarding adverse reactions. In the introduction, the paper states, “. . . it has now been established in numerous studies, [that] vaccines may have completely unexpected effects on overall mortality.”And that “The placebo-controlled RCTs of COVID-19 vaccines were halted rapidly due to clear [positive] effects on COVID-19 infections.”&nbsp;<figure class="image image-style-align-center image_resized" style="width:70.28%;"><img src="/uploads/image_63a1e3ec12.jpeg"></figure>Source: <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4072489">https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4072489</a>The data showed that participants who received the mRNA vaccine had more cardiovascular deaths, non-accidental deaths, and all-cause deaths compared to the placebo groups after examining nine randomized-controlled trials (RCTs).&nbsp;If not for the lives the vaccines saved in COVID deaths, the mRNA vaccines would have killed more people than they saved. This is important since many people taking the mRNA vaccines are at low risk of dying from COVID. &nbsp;It was noted in the conclusion that most of the wealthier countries chose the mRNA vaccines, which were connected to higher mortality. The authors concluded by saying that “this could turn out to be a very costly decision, both economically and health-wise.” &nbsp;<h2>&nbsp;</h2><h3>Real-world data &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</h3>Can the observation that the mRNA vaccines potentially cause more deaths than they save be seen in real-world data?The few <a href="https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/no-all-cause-mortality-benefit-in-pfizers-clinical-trial-for-mrna-vaccine-why-6d89b1de0c8d">observational studies</a> that examined the issue found that vaccination was associated with reduced overall mortality, so there was nothing to fear.These studies were conducted in the first six months of the vaccination campaign, but it seems things have changed.&nbsp;The Exposé presented <a href="https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland">data</a> from the UK’s Office of National Statistics comparing all-cause mortality from the start of the vaccination campaign in January 2021 to January 2022 and found a surprising difference.<figure class="image"><img src="/uploads/image_7e6fda3d5e.png"></figure>Source: <a href="https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/20/analysis-gov-data-finds-covid-vaccination-increases-risk-death/">https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/20/analysis-gov-data-finds-covid-vaccination-increases-risk-death/</a>Vaccinated individuals in January 2021 were dramatically more protected against all causes of death compared to the unvaccinated. But by January 2022, vaccinated individuals who did not receive a booster were dramatically worse off compared to the unvaccinated. &nbsp;Perhaps it is just a statistical anomaly in January’s data. So, The Exposé charted the data over the course of 2021 to see when this change occurred.<figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/image_2bc251c40e.png"></figure>Source: <a href="https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/20/analysis-gov-data-finds-covid-vaccination-increases-risk-death/">https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/20/analysis-gov-data-finds-covid-vaccination-increases-risk-death/</a>According to the above graph, during the months of October and November, the picture started to change – unless the vaccinated received a booster they would be more likely to die than if they took no vaccine at all. And the situation was much worse for those injected with just one dose (red lines).While it makes sense that a booster shot would lower the risk of death, it is concerning that the two-dose vaccine was associated with higher mortality than no vaccine at all. This may be a good reason to take a booster, but it is also concerning that hundreds of millions of people are now at greater risk of death just because they got vaccinated.Before drawing a conclusion it’s imperative that the analysis be broken down by age range since that’s a key indicator of COVID mortality and of vaccination uptake. If age is ignored, it is possible the unvaccinated are dying less because they tend to be younger, and younger people generally have much lower mortality. &nbsp;&nbsp;The following graphs show all-cause mortality per 100K for different age groups:<figure class="image"><img src="/uploads/image_ba6f495e40.png"></figure>Source: <a href="https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/20/analysis-gov-data-finds-covid-vaccination-increases-risk-death/">https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/20/analysis-gov-data-finds-covid-vaccination-increases-risk-death/</a>Across every age group, without exception, by January 2022 the death rate among the double vaccinated was higher than for the unvaccinated.&nbsp;It is still possible that the unvaccinated in each group happen to be healthier, or less prone to death than those who were vaccinated, and for that, a more in-depth study would need to be conducted.<h2>&nbsp;</h2><h3>Data further into 2022</h3>The Office of National Statistics only <a href="https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland">provided data</a> through January 2022. No data on all-cause mortality in the UK by vaccination status is available past January 2022.&nbsp;Since we’ve seen earlier that mRNA vaccines in particular save lives overall only because they reduce COVID deaths, but otherwise would increase deaths, a look at the vaccines' effectiveness on COVID deaths should give us insight regarding all-cause mortality. If the vaccines don’t protect against COVID deaths, then all-cause mortality would be higher among the vaccinated. &nbsp;The UK Health Security Agency provides weekly surveillance reports on COVID related deaths and vaccination status.The Exposé analyzed data from January to the end of March&nbsp;(<a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1052353/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_5.pdf">Week 5,</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1058464/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-9.pdf">Week 9</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1066759/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-13.pdf">Week 13</a>) and discovered the following:<figure class="image"><img src="/uploads/image_7ee81c1e18.jpeg"></figure>Source: <a href="https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/24/gov-report-fully-vaccinated-suffering-ade-since-new-year/">https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/24/gov-report-fully-vaccinated-suffering-ade-since-new-year/</a>In all ages over 40 years old, the unvaccinated are less likely to die from COVID than the double dose vaccinated.If the vaccine was just ineffective at protecting against COVID related deaths, then the death rates would be about the same. But the charts clearly indicate that the vaccines provide no protection without the booster. &nbsp;Moreover, they provide negative protection.This is very similar to what we saw regarding <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/library/pedia/vaccine-effectiveness/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">vaccine effectiveness</a> against COVID infections. The original studies did not show, or even look for vaccine protection against COVID infections. And as time went on, it became clear that the vaccine not only did not protect against infection but was associated with increased infections.Having a greater risk of developing a COVID infection may be an acceptable price to pay if the vaccine protects against serious illness and death, but if the vaccine is associated not only with more infections but also more deaths, of what value is it?Based on several RCTS, and months of real-world data, the evidence suggests that the COVID vaccines are currently associated with more deaths than lives saved.

large_iStock-1146889860.jpg

medium_iStock-1146889860.jpg

small_iStock-1146889860.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1146889860.jpg

iStock-1146889860.jpg

All-cause mortality and COVID vaccination cause for concern

UK data show increased mortality in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated

Who are COVID shots designed for?That’s just one of many intriguing questions prompted by a perusal of the Pfizer documents currently being published in batches after a&nbsp;federal&nbsp;judge&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;state of Texas ruled that the pharmaceutical company is obligated to release the data in a timely manner.The simple answer to our opening question is: everyone. That’s why we have been pressured and often mandated to take the shots – the powers-that-be want us all to take them. But with COVID, nothing is simple.By now, everyone must know that COVID is only dangerous for a very small tranche of the population. On average, people who die from COVID are in their late 70s to early 80s and have several serious comorbidities. Children are at virtually zero risk of dying of COVID; anyone under the age of 50 faces only a very tiny risk.Therefore, it would be reasonable to assume that vaccines against COVID were designed first and foremost for that small minority which genuinely has something to worry about – which would mean that the trial studies testing the shots before they were marketed should have focused on this small minority.That is not what happened.In the latest batch of documents released, Pfizer’s “exclusion criteria” for participation in its trials are listed.&nbsp;<a href="https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162-01-interim3-report-body.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Here</a> they are. &nbsp;I'd like to focus on #29.&nbsp;<figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_1_8b8c274015.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_2_fa8d03be62.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_3_7051e52524.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_4_2812f75e55.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_5_bfe90778a9.png"></figure>29. For older adults only: Have a condition known to put them at high risk for severe COVID-19, including those with any of the following risk factors:-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Hypertension-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Diabetes mellitus-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Asthma-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Chronic liver disease-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; … chronic kidney disease…-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Serious heart conditions…-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Cancer-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Are immune compromised…-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Resident in a long-term facility…&nbsp;That’s quite a comprehensive list even aside from the other 28 categories excluded. It also includes virtually everyone at high risk of dying of COVID, as we know now, and as Pfizer and others “in the know” had good reason to suspect then, with plenty of evidence to rely on. (Incidentally, asthma is no longer considered a risk factor, but Pfizer was playing it safe.)Playing it safe?Safe for whom?Didn’t they want to know if their shots were a) effective and b) safe for those who were theoretically most in need of them?Didn’t the FDA want to know?

large_iStock-458618835.jpg

medium_iStock-458618835.jpg

small_iStock-458618835.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-458618835.jpg

iStock-458618835.jpg

Pfizer

All high risk groups were excluded from the trial studies. Why?

The Pfizer Files: This month's revelations

The FDA could have issued similar warnings about the Pfizer & Moderna shots. Why didn't it?

Is the Johnson & Johnson vaccine really more dangerous?

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘‘Parents: It's YOUR Job’ (Ep. 2084 - 5.2022).&nbsp; The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlash

large_Parents.jpg

medium_Parents.jpg

small_Parents.jpg

thumbnail_Parents.jpg

Parents.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘Parents: It's YOUR Job’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Frontline Flash.svg

Frontline Flash Full Logo-01.webp

Frontline Flash

Watch flash news presented in 120 seconds or less by Frontline Flash.

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with host John Strand presents On Location @ ReAwaken America Tour 'Vote the Bums Out!'” featuring General Michael Flynn (Ep. 2083 - 5.18.22). The Real Story of Right Here ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlash

large_MicrosoftTeams-image.png

medium_MicrosoftTeams-image.png

small_MicrosoftTeams-image.png

thumbnail_MicrosoftTeams-image.png

MicrosoftTeams-image.png

Frontline Flash™ On Location: “Vote the Bums Out!” feat. Gen. Michael Flynn @ ReAwaken America Tour

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘‘Fatalities End Mandates In Italian Court’ (Ep. 2082 - 5.12.22). &nbsp;The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlashSource: https://rairfoundation.com/italian-court-rules-mandatory-vaccination-unconstitutional-fatal-side-effects-to-risky-video/

large_Italian Court.jpg

medium_Italian Court.jpg

small_Italian Court.jpg

thumbnail_Italian Court.jpg

Italian Court.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘Fatalities End Mandates In Italian Court’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘Transgenderism: Emotion vs. Biology’ (Ep. 2081 - 5.11.22). &nbsp;The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlashSource: https://www.theepochtimes.com/kansas-state-senate-overrides-governors-veto-on-transgender-sports-ban-bill_4430446.html?

large_Transgenderism.jpg

medium_Transgenderism.jpg

small_Transgenderism.jpg

thumbnail_Transgenderism.jpg

Transgenderism.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘Transgenderism: Emotion vs. Biology’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘The Jab: A Real Risk to Pregnancy’ (Ep. 2080 - 5.9.22). &nbsp;The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlashSource: https://www.theepochtimes.com/what-ive-seen-in-the-last-two-years-is-unprecedented-physician-on-covid-vaccine-side-effects-on-pregnant-women_4428291.html?

large_Pregnancy Risk.jpg

medium_Pregnancy Risk.jpg

small_Pregnancy Risk.jpg

thumbnail_Pregnancy Risk.jpg

Pregnancy Risk.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘The Jab: A Real Risk to Pregnancy’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘Churches Paid To Push The Shots’ (Ep. 2079 - 5.6.22). &nbsp;The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlashSource: https://www.technocracy.news/churches-are-receiving-federal-grant-funds-to-promote-covid-injections/

large_Churches Paid.jpg

medium_Churches Paid.jpg

small_Churches Paid.jpg

thumbnail_Churches Paid.jpg

Churches Paid.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘Churches Paid To Push The Shots’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘769 Athletes Collapse...In 1 Yea’ (Ep. 2078 - 5.5.22). The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlashSource: <a href="https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/update-jaw-dropping-769-athletes-collapsed-competing-past-year-avg-age-players-suffering-cardiac-arrest-just-23-video/">https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/update-jaw-dropping-769-athletes-collapsed-competing-past-year-avg-age-players-suffering-cardiac-arrest-just-23-video/</a>

large_769 Athletes.jpg

medium_769 Athletes.jpg

small_769 Athletes.jpg

thumbnail_769 Athletes.jpg

769 Athletes.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘769 Athletes Collapse...In 1 Year’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘Mississippi Governor Bans Vax Mandates’ (Ep. 2077 - 5.4.22). &nbsp;The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlashSource: https://news.yahoo.com/mississippi-governor-signs-bill-banning-204131162.html

large_Miss Gov.jpg

medium_Miss Gov.jpg

small_Miss Gov.jpg

thumbnail_Miss Gov.jpg

Miss Gov.jpg

Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘Mississippi Governor Bans Vax Mandates’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Myocarditis

Most Popular

Frontline Flash

Support the cause