US to authorize Pfizer booster for 5-to-11-year-olds

Lockdowns leave toddlers unable to speak and play properly

UK: Medical Freedom Alliance open letter to NHS general practice managers re face mask requirements in GP surgeries

A functioning economy is essential to public health

Fraudulent trial on ivermectin published by the world's top medical journal. Big Pharma reigns - part 2

Who are COVID shots designed for?That’s just one of many intriguing questions prompted by a perusal of the Pfizer documents currently being published in batches after a&nbsp;federal&nbsp;judge&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;state of Texas ruled that the pharmaceutical company is obligated to release the data in a timely manner.The simple answer to our opening question is: everyone. That’s why we have been pressured and often mandated to take the shots – the powers-that-be want us all to take them. But with COVID, nothing is simple.By now, everyone must know that COVID is only dangerous for a very small tranche of the population. On average, people who die from COVID are in their late 70s to early 80s and have several serious comorbidities. Children are at virtually zero risk of dying of COVID; anyone under the age of 50 faces only a very tiny risk.Therefore, it would be reasonable to assume that vaccines against COVID were designed first and foremost for that small minority which genuinely has something to worry about – which would mean that the trial studies testing the shots before they were marketed should have focused on this small minority.That is not what happened.In the latest batch of documents released, Pfizer’s “exclusion criteria” for participation in its trials are listed.&nbsp;<a href="https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162-01-interim3-report-body.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Here</a> they are. &nbsp;I'd like to focus on #29.&nbsp;<figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_1_8b8c274015.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_2_fa8d03be62.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_3_7051e52524.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_4_2812f75e55.png"></figure><figure class="image image_resized" style="width:75%;"><img src="/uploads/pfizer_dump_exclusion_5_bfe90778a9.png"></figure>29. For older adults only: Have a condition known to put them at high risk for severe COVID-19, including those with any of the following risk factors:-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Hypertension-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Diabetes mellitus-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Asthma-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Chronic liver disease-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; … chronic kidney disease…-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Serious heart conditions…-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Cancer-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Are immune compromised…-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Resident in a long-term facility…&nbsp;That’s quite a comprehensive list even aside from the other 28 categories excluded. It also includes virtually everyone at high risk of dying of COVID, as we know now, and as Pfizer and others “in the know” had good reason to suspect then, with plenty of evidence to rely on. (Incidentally, asthma is no longer considered a risk factor, but Pfizer was playing it safe.)Playing it safe?Safe for whom?Didn’t they want to know if their shots were a) effective and b) safe for those who were theoretically most in need of them?Didn’t the FDA want to know?

large_iStock-458618835.jpg

medium_iStock-458618835.jpg

small_iStock-458618835.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-458618835.jpg

iStock-458618835.jpg

Medical

Pfizer

All high risk groups were excluded from the trial studies. Why?

The Pfizer Files: This month's revelations

<div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe width="100%" height="300" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" allow="autoplay" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/1263277555&amp;color=%23ff5500&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;show_teaser=true&amp;visual=true"></iframe><div style="font-size: 10px; color: #cccccc;line-break: anywhere;word-break: normal;overflow: hidden;white-space: nowrap;text-overflow: ellipsis; font-family: Interstate,Lucida Grande,Lucida Sans Unicode,Lucida Sans,Garuda,Verdana,Tahoma,sans-serif;font-weight: 100;"><a href="https://soundcloud.com/user-439846197-297555475" title="AFLDS" target="_blank" style="color: #cccccc; text-decoration: none;">AFLDS</a> · <a href="https://soundcloud.com/user-439846197-297555475/aflds-frontline-news-roundup-6-may-2022" title="AFLDS Frontline News Roundup 6 May 2022" target="_blank" style="color: #cccccc; text-decoration: none;">AFLDS Frontline News Roundup 6 May 2022</a></div></div>

large_iStock-183305487.jpg

medium_iStock-183305487.jpg

small_iStock-183305487.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-183305487.jpg

iStock-183305487.jpg

Columnists

World News

Frontline News Director Mordechai Sones presents this week's top stories

Listen: AFLDS Frontline Roundup

Christa Kachurak remembers the moment she and her husband Drew decided to homeschool their children.&nbsp;After 8-year-old Max was forced to learn at home due to school closures, Christa and Drew knew they had to start planning.&nbsp;“At that point, my husband and I sat down and we drew our lines in the sand&nbsp;as far as what it would look like if he were to return to public school, and our number one thing was we were not going to cover his face,” Christa told Yudi Sherman of America’s Frontline News. “We were not going to put a mask on him.”&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe class="rumble" width="640" height="360" src="https://rumble.com/embed/v11vegh/?pub=vbksd" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>So, while children in Nevada’s public schools were forced to cover their faces throughout the school day, Max and 5-year-old Goldie started homeschooling.&nbsp;“It’s been incredible,” Christa says two years later. &nbsp;She had tried homeschooling years before, when Max was in kindergarten, but she had unrealistic expectations.&nbsp;“It’s taken a few years to kind of fine-tune our schedule,” she says. “For us, schooling four days a week is about the max that we can do, because we really enjoy our weekends and we really enjoy the freedom of that.”&nbsp;Now, Christa schools Monday through Thursday. Like other homeschoolers, Max and Goldie start their day at about 9:30 AM and finish before lunch, after which they spend the rest of the day outside.&nbsp;Christa typically gets Goldie started while Max, who is in third grade, independently works on his handwriting, reading and math practice, among other subjects. Then, she switches her focus to Max, and back and forth.&nbsp;After they finish their work, Max sometimes goes to his golf or lacrosse lessons while Goldie takes ballet.&nbsp;“We really just try to focus on their interests, number one, to keep them engaged and keep them excited,” Christa says. “I had placed school in such a strange emphasis in their life that I was kind of forgetting about their childhood.”&nbsp;That results in a bit less classroom learning and a bit more fort building, because nothing beats practicing&nbsp;science experiments in a cool new fort.&nbsp;&nbsp;As far as curriculum is concerned, Christa says she uses the “Open and Go” approach, where she uses the textbook as a guide.&nbsp;“We’re busy, we’ve got a lot going on,” says the former teacher. “So I can’t sit up for five hours a night and prepare for the next day.”&nbsp;But what Christa finds especially valuable about homeschooling her children is that she knows their backstories and how they think.&nbsp;"I know how [Max] learned addition and subtraction. So when I’m going to teach multiplication and division, I can say, ‘Hey, remember how we used to do it like this? Use that, but let’s adjust it for multiplication.’ I can anticipate a struggle before it even happens,” she says.&nbsp;As one homeschooling parent told her, “No one knows your child better than you do.”&nbsp;When asked how she thinks Max would measure up against his peers in public school, Christa says he’s far more advanced – maybe too advanced.&nbsp;“We wouldn’t even be able to put him back in fourth grade. He would be so far beyond that,” she says. “I laugh with my husband now, I’m like ‘we’re in too deep’.”&nbsp;Another big selling point of homeschool is the time.&nbsp;“His ability to understand complex things is truly only because we have the time to do it. We don’t rush through subjects. If there’s something he’s truly interested in, we’ll stay on it for weeks and weeks. We’ll do research on it."&nbsp;This is the first of two parts on Homeschooling with the Kachuraks.&nbsp;

large_iStock-1217867689.jpg

medium_iStock-1217867689.jpg

small_iStock-1217867689.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1217867689.jpg

iStock-1217867689.jpg

US News

'I had placed school in such a strange emphasis in their life that I was kind of forgetting about their childhood'

Lines in the sand: Homeschooling with the Kachuraks

World Health Assembly to vote on IHR amendments in unprecedented WHO power grab  

Israel's Laniado Hospital refusing to train unvaccinated frontline health workers

Twitter employee confirms ‘Commie’ culture

large_iStock-613033814.jpg

medium_iStock-613033814.jpg

small_iStock-613033814.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-613033814.jpg

iStock-613033814.jpg

Opinion

What does this phrase actually mean? 

Watch: What it really means to 'Trust the Science'